Si Tocan a Una... ¡Marchamos Todas! Por Andrea María Guzmán Mauleón * Sin lugar a duda, la conmemoración… Es la temporada de impuestos: 3 maneras en que los profesionales pueden ayudarlo a ahorrar este año… Los mejores vehículos eléctricos de lujo del 2024 Por Enrique Kogan  Los expertos en automoción del sitio Rerev han elaborado… La Infancia en Migración Continúa en Riesgo Por Mtro. Cristian Quintanar Castro * Uno se imaginaría que los años… Oklahoma Opry inicia la temporada de espectáculos de 2024 Oklahoma City - Después de una pausa de tres meses, el Oklahoma…

OSSBA Encourages Oklahomans to Vote No on State Question 800

OSSBA Encourages Oklahomans to  Vote No on State Question 800

State Question 800 could endanger an important source of dedicated revenue for Oklahoma schools, and the Oklahoma State School Boards Association is encouraging Oklahomans to oppose the ballot measure on Nov. 6.

“Simply put, this state question is vague, filled with unknowns and could erode millions of dollars in de

dicated funding for public schools,” OSSBA Executive Director Shawn Hime said in a message to education leaders across the state.

SQ 800 would create a new state budget reserve fund called the Oklahoma Vision Fund. Beginning July 1, 2020, 5 percent of gross production tax collections would be diverted to the fund. The amount diverted would grow by .2 percent each year until all GPT collections are diverted to the fund.

Since schools currently receive about 10 percent of GPT collections as dedicated revenue, this will result in reduced funding for schools without a guarantee that the lost revenue would be offset.  

“There’s nothing visionary about the planned erosion of dedicated funding for public education,” Hime said. “It’s bad policy, and a step backward. The state’s largest ever teacher pay raise that passed last session was a great first step, but the work of properly investing in public education isn’t finished. Our per-student investment in education is still last in our region. Our students deserve better.”

Other concerns include that the fund would be allowed to grow perpetually without a cap and without a mechanism for the legislature to defer deposits or tap the fund in case of a revenue shortfall or other emergency. Only a small percentage of the fund's balance would be available for appropriations, and some of the money could even be diverted to fund obligations of cities and counties.

Gov. Mary Fallin vetoed a similar measure because of myriad concerns, and Hime said even an ill-conceived constitutional amendment would be difficult to undo.

“I appreciate the intent behind the question and the desire to stabilize the state budget, but this isn’t the answer,” Hime said.

 

Comentar con Facebook

Comentar

Los campos obligatorios estan marcados con *

0 Comentarios

Noticias Relacionadas

Compartir